[https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/97/18001]
[https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/97/18002]
Issue |
EPL
Volume 95, Number 2, July 2011
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 28008 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Interdisciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/95/28008 | |
Published online | 05 July 2011 |
Are stress-free membranes really “tensionless”?
Institute of Physics, JGU Mainz - D-55099 Mainz, Germany, EU
a
friederike.schmid@uni-mainz.de
Received:
1
March
2011
Accepted:
6
June
2011
In recent years it has been argued that the tension parameter driving the fluctuations of fluid membranes, differs from the imposed lateral stress, the “frame tension”. In particular, stress-free membranes were predicted to have a residual fluctuation tension. In the present paper, this argument is reconsidered and shown to be inherently inconsistent —in the sense that a linearized theory, the Monge model, is used to predict a nonlinear effect. Furthermore, numerical simulations of one-dimensional stiff membranes are presented, which clearly demonstrate, first, that the internal “intrinsic” stress in membranes indeed differs from the frame tension as conjectured, but second, that the fluctuations are nevertheless driven by the frame tension. With this assumption, the predictions of the Monge model agree excellently with the simulation data for stiffness and tension values spanning several orders of magnitude.
PACS: 87.16.dj – Dynamics and fluctuations / 68.03.Kn – Dynamics (capillary waves) / 68.35.Md – Surface thermodynamics, surface energies
© EPLA, 2011
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.