Volume 100, Number 1, October 2012
|Number of page(s)||5|
|Section||Condensed Matter: Electronic Structure, Electrical, Magnetic and Optical Properties|
|Published online||18 October 2012|
A comparison between tetragonal-rhombohedral and tetragonal-orthorhombic phase boundaries on piezoelectricity enhancement
1 Multi-disciplinary Materials Research Center, Frontier Institute of Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University - Xi'an 710049, China
2 Ferroic Physics Group, National Institute for Materials Science - Tsukuba, 305–0047, Ibaraki, Japan
(a) Present address: State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, Xi'an Jiaotong University - No. 28, Xianning West Road, 710049, Xi'an, China; firstname.lastname@example.org
Received: 17 August 2012
Accepted: 12 September 2012
We made a detailed comparison of physical properties between the tetragonal-rhombohedral (T-R) phase boundary (in the Ba(SnTi)O3-x(BaCa)TiO3 system) and the tetragonal-orthorhombic (T-O) phase boundary (in the Ba(SnxTi1−x)O3 system). The contrasting results suggest that the T-R phase boundary enhances the piezoelectricity more significantly than the T-O phase boundary. Such difference is considered to stem from the dissimilar anisotropy for polarization rotation, the different elastic softening and the different domain wall contribution between T-R and T-O phase boundaries.
PACS: 77.65.Bn – Piezoelectric and electrostrictive constants / 77.22.-d – Dielectric properties of solids and liquids
© EPLA, 2012
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.