Volume 120, Number 5, December 2017
|Number of page(s)||7|
|Published online||22 February 2018|
A proposal for a quantitative indicator of original research output
Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Galileo Galilei”, Università di Padova - Via Marzolo 8, Padova 35131, Italy and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, 6127 Wilder Laboratory - Hanover, NH 03755, USA
Received: 14 November 2017
Accepted: 1 February 2018
The use of quantitative indicators of scientific productivity seems now quite widespread for assessing researchers and research institutions. There is a general perception, however, that these indicators are not necessarily representative of the originality of the research carried out, being primarily indicative of a more or less prolific scientific activity and of the size of the targeted scientific subcommunity. We first discuss some of the drawbacks of the broadly adopted h-index and of the fact that it represents, in an average sense, an indicator derivable from the total number of citations. Then we propose an indicator which, although not immune from biases, seems more in line with the general expectations for quantifying what is typically considered original work. Qualitative arguments on how different indicators may shape the future of science are finally discussed.
PACS: 01.75.+m – Science and society / 01.85.+f – Careers in physics and science / 87.23.Ge – Dynamics of social systems
© EPLA, 2018
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.