| Issue |
EPL
Volume 153, Number 4, February 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 40001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | General physics | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ae437c | |
| Published online | 24 February 2026 | |
Design and optimization of planar undulators for X-ray free-electron lasers: Comparative analyses considerations on magnetic structures
1 Department of Engineering Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Ankara University - 06100 Ankara, Turkey
2 Turkish Energy, Nuclear and Mining Research Council (TENMAK) - 06560 Ankara, Turkey
Received: 30 December 2025
Accepted: 9 February 2026
Abstract
A comparative design and magnetic performance analysis of planar undulator configurations is presented using the 3D magnetostatics simulation code RADIA. Three representative structures are investigated: a pure permanent magnet undulator, a hybrid configuration with Vanadium Permendur poles, and a hybrid configuration with iron poles. The designs are assessed in terms of achievable magnetic field strength, undulator parameter, harmonic content, field uniformity, and overall magnetic field quality. Numerical results obtained from RADIA are systematically compared with theoretical estimates based on established empirical models. Results indicate that the Vanadium Permendur-based hybrid configuration achieves the highest peak magnetic field and improved harmonic purity, thereby satisfying the requirements for high-brilliance synchrotron radiation sources and free-electron laser applications. The iron-based hybrid design provides a cost-effective alternative with competitive performance, while the pure permanent magnet configuration, despite its structural simplicity, shows limited field strength and increased harmonic distortions. These results confirm the reliability of RADIA as a predictive tool for planar undulator design and optimization.
© 2026 The author(s)
Published by the EPLA under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY). Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.